48 Comments

  1. there are so many opinions about the covid-19 I for one is am not a covid denier. I know its real.. my best friend had it.. and his mother in law died from it who was like a second mother to me as well. . but neither am I a person that would mask shame someone for not wearing one..But i will mask shame someone for WEARING ONE WHEN ITS NOT NEEDED MS. LEIGH ANN CALDWELL.. GOOD GOSH WOMAN!!!

  2. My Experience from Uk. Married for 4 years with infertility, my journey has ended with the help of Dr Oyama. I have joined many infertility journey blogs online just to have a comforted heart over my problem and this has helped me to find the right man to help me cure this devastating problem. As a patient of endometriosis stage 3, it was really difficult to have a child but with the help of Oyama I got natural herbs and conceived within weeks of herbal treatment and before I knew it, I was finally pregnant. I never believed it was possible after 9 years of marriage. Thanks to everyone who has helped me both mentally and emotionally through this journey Oyama solved my problem with his natural herbs and I promise to manifest his work to other people and friends. Whatsapp Message/Call him on +2348108264684 and Email Oyama at: droyamasolutiontemple@gmail.com    Visit his Page  @Oyamaherbs

  3. Hi everyone,I am happy to make every one of you in similar to met with this priest and have your lover back to your self, he had ones helped me before contact Him on his email address  otutuspelltemple@gmail.com

  4. Are you not Amazed how even during a Pandemic neither side is talking about real healthcare for all. Now, even now with voters dying it's all about push the ACA when so many people are stuck at home not working.

  5. MR.BOOKER…DANO…;)…OH MY, THIS MAN IS SUCH A PAIN…THIS WAS ABOUT JUDGE BARRETT'S PROFESSIONAL ABILITY, NOT ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP…STAY ON POINT…PLEASE…;)

  6. MS.HIRONO…SHE IS SO CONDESCENDING…AND LIKE SOME OF THE OTHERS OF HER ILK, THINKS SHE CAN SPEAK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE…WHEN HER PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE CAN'T EVEN GET ONE PERSON TO COME TO ONE OF HIS RALLIES…AND, TO ADD IT APPEARS THAT HE MAY BE INDICTED FOR TREASON SOON, FROM THE NEWS THAT'S COMING OUT IN THE LAST COUPLE OF DAYS…;)

  7. SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL (LIZARD-MAN) IS HE NOT ONE OF THE EMAIL CORRESPONDENTS TO HILLARY CLINTON & OTHERS IN THE WIKILEAKS FILES?…THIS IS ONE BAD 'FILL IN THE BLANKS'…;)

  8. PLEASE show me ONE liberal or left leaning woman that could hold a candle to Judge Barrett! She's dizzyingly articulate, a wife, a mother, a sibling, really an impressive woman. Her intellect is reflected in the fact that she was able to recall as much as she did and regurgitate it at will. I just suspect the left doesn't produce people of her caliber by the simple virtue of them being morally bankrupt.

  9. Roe v.Wade is not a ‘super precedent case’ as it is categorized in its precedence is clearly noted this one case is not of her world and or of her religious belief. This meaning that it can be questioned and or overruled per Judge Barrett. Truly believe her religious beliefs will always intervene in her own way of deciding any case. Her critique in other areas such as the one with Justice Roberts on the Affordable Care Act is another area of which she will also not concur with in any one future case.

  10. Mainstream media is now the propaganda network.
    Censorship is alive…left wing fascism has begun. The New World Order has been exposed.
    President Trump has exposed the biden clinton corruption and the mainstream media is censoring it.
    President Trump is correct again!!
    Trump 2020🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  11. #1 NOW IS A PERFECT TIME TO TAKE A LOOK AT *TERM LIMITS FOR ALL FEDERAL JUDGES *THE REAL-ISSUE CONCERNING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES = 3/4 OF A CENTURY FOR ONE MIND-SET ON A BENCH IS JUST TOO LONG!!! This is predicated on the answer to the question: Why are POLITICIANS from both parties clamoring so fervently to nominate Justices to all of the Federal Court benches? The answer to that question provides a clear understanding of how Americans have come to view our Federal Judges, and that is, as an arm of each political party, respectively. And the main follow-through on this fact is that Judges these days are more-than-willing to issue partisan rulings these days. This is in fact, realized, in the many rulings that have been issued from the various benches, from the lower Courts, right up through the Applet Courts, and through to the Supreme Court of these Lands. Just look at the resent Florida Court ruling on the "restoration of felon's right's to vote in elections. Consider the referendum-vote of the people of Florida, who voted overwhelming to give those rights back to those felons who have served their time for crimes committed." The Governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis, in his plight to manipulate the voter-ranks in the 2020 election, devised a plan to withhold the restoration of those felon's rights by arbitrarily imposing the requirement that those felons must pay back any fines before being able to vote. Moving through the court system, the claims of those felons, that this was not the People's Will, was dismissed by (Republican favored) Applet Judges, in favor of the voter-suppressing Republican Governor. This sort of ruling is plainly clear that Federal Judges are becoming increasingly partisan with their rulings. This could come back to find the Republican ranks on the other side of such future partisan rulings. So this is the solution: "We need to find a way to take partisanship out of our judicial system, the way it was intended in the first place. We need Term Limits for our Federal Judges, and a reform of the process of which they are appointed to the Benches" I believe, with the modern political climate, it will be impossible to solve, that is, within the process justices are appointed today. I believe the American People would be better served if our Judges were VOTED onto the benches by both branches of the government: House and the Senate. Most importantly, I believe LIFE APPOINTMENTS to the Bench is severely problematic for the Republic. Three quarters of a century could go by, having a partisan Justice sitting on the bench skewing rulings that only make sense to a small number of American Citizens. This has to change if we are to have a better system of government. The course we are on now will only render the US looking more and more like Belarus of today.

  12. So, ‘We the People…who pay taxes, who should have choice in all public servant positioned people; hence the reason why we all must vote in cure of those choices. Yet, a-much of those votes are not on the low-income/poor person’s side. It still amazes me how these types of selected individuals are ‘specifically’ searched/researched and then selected to be questioned by the Senate and voted on without ‘We the People’s’ vote. This possible, near future and for a lifetime, SCJ who may just be on that ‘hierarchy’ seat, unless our world shatters even more than it is now, will indeed bring down the ‘Affordable Care Act’ with respect to healthcare and Womens’ choice with their body’s…out into space. I would also throw in Social Security, Housing Assistance or any other benefit for low-income people which at this time is most of the nation due to the pandemic. Many of those with no job, on unemployment, have had to figure out how to either pay mortgage or rent and what is left for their food, if afforded since prices are also very high. And, many have also been evicted living on the streets or in their cars, if they still have one. Her stance is only her view of her world never including Real/Everyday World Issues. She does not negate the law to apply to our present real world ‘today’ issues and I do not think she ever will. This is not helpful to us the ‘People’ because she was not elected by us, but instead by unique interests for unique groups catering only in their own worlds.

  13. She’s been a judge for 3 years and her answers show it. We need someone who has had experience and knowledge for a lifetime appointment. She does not fit the criteria

  14. Please people, stop voting hard core Catholics and Christians into the White House and senate. The government is to help the people not control them. They press their ideologies onto us with their laws they pass based on their own religious morals. Refer to Thomas Jefferson on the matter. If you pass a law based on your own religious morals you are pressing your religion onto other people wether you wanna look at it with a clear eye or not. Please. Some of us don’t believe in fairy tales and believe we should be able to have fun at what ever the risk of it doesn’t affect any living being. We aren’t bothering you directly. Please stop bothering us with your religious morals. Your book says I can sell my daughter into slavery I don’t think you guys should be making rules to govern people who wanna live freely.

  15. Prophet utsava let us know, kamala has been arrested, in her plea deal, she has to say dumb things( I'm guessing that includes the arrogance). Gen. Mattis is afraid of Trump, he is part of the swamp and has a lot to lose. And i believe she said fake news nbc will be the first to get dismantled, others will follow. She also said Trump will bring out cancer cures that the swamp was hiding, and the best part, that JFK Jr. will replace pence.

  16. MS.KLOBUCHAR IS THE FEMALE VERSION OF MR.WHITEHOUSE…I AM SURPRISED THEY AREN'T MAN & WIFE…HAVING SAID THAT, SHE PRESIDES AS SENATOR OVER ONE OF THE WORST KEPT STATES IN THE UNION>MINNESOTA…HER DEER TRACKS ARE MORE LIKE RABBIT TRAILS…THE FOUNDATION OF OUR DEMOCRACY?…WILL SOMEONE TELL THESE PEOPLE THAT AMERICA IS NOT A SOCIALIST DEMOCRACY, IT'S A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC…AND IT NEVER WILL BE A SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST STATE THAT MS.KLOBUCHAR DESIRES TO SEE HAPPEN…NOT HAVING JUSTICE GINSBURG ON THE SUPREME COURT IS SO FRIGHTENING RIGHT NOW, YOU SAY?…THANK GOD SHE IS NO LONGER ON THE SUPREME COURT…THAT WOMAN APPROVED OF EUGENICS/FULL TERM ABORTION/DEATH PANELS & PEDOPHILIA…DO YOUR HOMEWORK…AND THIS SPEAKS VOLUMES ON WHO MS.KLOBUCHAR REALLY IS…;)

  17. SENATOR TED CRUZ HIT THE BALL OUT OF THE PARK & I CAN IMAGINE THAT, THAT INSUFFERABLE MR.WHITEHOUSE IS MELTING INTO HIS SEAT IN THIS CONFIRMATION HEARING…;)

  18. TO ADD, WITH EACH SLIDE PRESENTATION (MANUAL AT THAT) HE GRUNTS OVER THE POSSIBILITY OF REVERSALS TO THE VERY THING HE IS PROBING THIS NOMINEE MS.BARRETT FOR…'ACTIVIST JUDICIAL DECISIONS'…WITH HIM, AND MANY DEMOCRATS…WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE, ISN'T GOOD FOR THE GANDER…TALK ABOUT HYPOCRISY…IT'S OKAY THAT UNCONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS WERE MADE BY FORMER PRESIDENTS' APPOINTED JUDGES…WHO THEY PICKED TO MAKE THESE UNCONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS, CHANGING LAWS ON THE BOOKS, AND WOULD MAKE IT SO THAT NARY A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT, ETC., COULD EVER REVERSE THESE SAME UNCONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS AGAIN…THE GRINCH THAT STOLE THE CONSTITUTION…;)

  19. MR.WHITEHOUSE, AS I'VE SAID MANY A TIME, YOU ARE AN INSUFFERABLE MAN…OBAMA CREATED OBAMA-CARE & DID MANY OTHER THINGS THAT HE WISHED AS PRESIDENT (AND I USE THAT WORD SPARINGLY)…WHY SHOULD NOT THE PRESIDENT PUT A JUDGE IN, THAT HE WISHES TO CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECT THE LIVES OF CHILDREN?…AND MAKE NO MISTAKE, FETUSES ARE VIABLE HUMAN BEINGS…THAT HAS BEEN PROVEN THROUGH SCIENCE…
    SECONDLY, WHY SHOULD NOT THE G.O.P.PLATFORM 'REVERSE' "ACTIVIST DECISIONS' RENDERED BY JUDGES, ETC., WHEN THEY ARE CONTRARY TO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS/LAWS & IS THAT NOT WHAT JUDGES LIKE AMY BERMAN JACKSON HAS DONE IN HER COURT ROOM & YOU AS DEMOCRATS ARE EXPECTING AMY CONEY BARRETT TO NOT DO, IN HER CAPACITY AS A CONFIRMED SUPREME COURT JUDGE…
    THIRDLY, JOSH HAWLEY IS CORRECT TO SEE IT THAT WAY>RE:ROE VS. WADE – AS I REMEMBER, WHEN, I BELIEVE, JUST BEFORE THE DEATH OF 'ROE'…THE SAME RECANTED AND SAID THEY HAD BEEN WRONG…REP.HAWLEY KNOWS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RIGHT & WRONG & IS WELL-VERSED IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW…SINCE HE EXPECTS THE NOMINEE FOR THE HIGHEST JUDICIAL SEAT IN THE LAND TO JUDGE ACCORDING TO THE RIGHTS OF ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS UNDER CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, HE WILL CHOOSE A NOMINEE THAT STICKS TO THOSE VALUES…
    FOURTH, WHERE A LAW ON THE BOOKS IS 'UNCONSTITUTIONAL' & WHERE A PREVIOUS PRESIDENT SOUGHT TO CHOOSE AN ACTIVIST JUDGE TO CHANGE A LONG-STANDING 'CONSTITUTIONAL' LAW, IT IS THE RIGHT OF A SUPREME COURT JUDGE TO REINSTATE THE LAW THAT WAS, ORIGINALLY AND CONSTITUTIONALLY, ON THE BOOKS…YOU MAY NOT LIKE IT, MR.'WHITEHOUSE', BUT, YOU ARE NOT THE PRESIDENT…AND NEITHER IS OBAMA…ACCORDING TO THE POLLS, PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS THAT STAND WITH HIM IN HIS POLICIES, OF WHICH MANY OF THE SAME, ARE PRO-LIFE…THE COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED ON SUCH PRINCIPLES & THOSE THAT TRY TO, THROUGH ACTIVIST MEANS, CHANGE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW TO WHAT THEY WISH IT TO BE, WILL BE OPPOSED BY THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS, FOR WHICH YOU, SIR, ARE SUPPOSED TO SERVE…;)

  20. SORRY, MR.DURBIN…ILL-NOISE IS A BLUE STATE…IT IS A GUN RESTRICTIVE ZONE, YET, IT IS ONE OF THE WORST STATES IN THE UNION WHEN IT COMES TO MURDER/GUN VIOLENCE…EVERY WEEKEND WE HEAR OF DOZENS OF PEOPLE LOSING THEIR LIVES IN CHICAGO ALONE…MANY OF THOSE GUNS ARE BOUGHT ON THE BLACK MARKET…IF GUNS WERE PERMITTED AS THEY ARE IN OTHER STATES, THE CRIME RATE FOR VIOLENCE WOULD BE WAY DOWN…GUNS ARE NOT THE PROBLEM, PEOPLE ARE…THEY WILL CONTINUE TO BUY GUNS ON THE STREET AS LONG AS THERE IS A RESTRICTION ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS…;)

  21. THE WORD WAS 'RE-CRIMINALIZE', NOT 'REALLY'…PLEASE KEY THE CAPTION CORRECTLY…THERE ARE SO MANY MISTAKES I'D HAVE TO WRITE THEM ALL DOWN, CAN'T DO IT FROM MEMORY…'CLAUSES' BECAME 'CLOUDS'…GEEZ…THE 'MAKING OF LOVE'?…NO, THE 'MAKING OF LAW'…OH MY…IT'S 'DISSENT' NOT 'DESCEND'…PLEASE LEARN HOW TO KEY CAPTIONS, THANKYOU!…;)

  22. 1:07 Introduction by news anchors
    32:54 Hearing begins, questioning by Graham
    1:01:43 Questioning by Feinstein
    1:30:57 by Grassley (interrupted until 1:39:12)
    1:51:38 by Leahy
    2:24:05 by Cornyn
    2:36:05 by Durbin (includes background checks and dark money)
    3:04:26 by Lee
    3:36:00 Recess
    4:17:49 Questioning by Whitehouse (discussing whether money is influencing policy)
    4:46:15 Ted Cruz
    5:17:30 by Klobuchar
    5:51:05 by Sasse
    6:13:31 by [name censored by Youtube]
    6:45:35 by Hawley
    7:05:01 Break
    7:27:40 Questioning by Blumenthal
    8:00:10 by Tillis
    8:09:46 by Hirono
    8:40:05 by Ernst
    8:55:30 by Booker
    9:27:16 by funny name, break at 9:52:40 with highlights
    10:24:28 by Harris
    10:55:02 by Kennedy
    11:24:47 by Blackburn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*